![]() It’s no surprise Twitter took unprecedented measures to stop the circulation of the Hunter Biden laptop story. In the 2020 election cycle, 98.47% of political contributions at Twitter were made to Democrats. Both the Biden campaign and the Trump White House had access to these tools, but they were based on contacts that were often politically aligned. One executive would write to another: ‘More to review from the Biden team.’ The reply would come back: ‘Handled.’Ĭelebrities and ordinary citizens could be removed at the behest of political parties. Matt Taibbi tweeted, “by 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. Tools initially designed to combat spam and financial fraudsters were used by “outside actors” to manipulate speech. In the first installment, journalist Matt Taibbi highlighted the evolution of Twitter’s censorship policies before the 2020 election. Musk also committed to releasing internal information on Twitter’s past censorship and “content moderation.” He contacted journalists to sift through internal Twitter documents and report their findings on Twitter - the Twitter Files. As part of Elon Musk’s stated commitment to free speech, he quickly restored Donald Trump’s Twitter account, following a poll on Twitter that disgruntled many on the left. ![]() This past November, Elon Musk finally took ownership of Twitter, firing the old executives. Ultimately, this would result in Twitter staff acting as an extension of the Democratic Party and FBI but not before a series of key events. ![]() However, Americans would want an explanation for the disappearance of a story from a prominent outlet like the New York Post, and what better narrative to explain this than Russian disinformation?Īs a politicized company, Twitter was uniquely vulnerable to approaches by the FBI. Such a move seems more familiar in authoritarian regimes. Ultimately, progressive federal agencies sought to censor the story in conjunction with social media companies, notably the FBI working with Twitter. With the 2020 election quickly approaching, the onus would be on Biden’s team to offset the “danger” of this story to their campaign. ![]() Russian disinformation became a convenient scapegoat for the failures of Democratic politicians that in reality caused Trump’s policies to take hold across America.īy extension, Russian interference could be used to discredit scandals and controversies relating to Democrats - for instance, the startling allegations which arose from the troublesome contents on Hunter Biden’s laptop as outlined in the infamous October 2020 New York Post article. High-ranking bureaucrats and Silicon Valley elites weaponized the public sphere against conservatives, silencing them while propping up progressive dogma and special interest groups.ĭuring the Trump administration, left-wing politicos made unfounded accusations that Donald Trump was propped up by Russian disinformation circulating through social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Since the 2016 election, social media giants and the government assured Americans of many false claims which undermined faith in conservatism. The past few months were revelatory in understanding the commitment of America’s institutions to the First Amendment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |